Trump Issues Executive Order To Expand Ivf Access: What To Know
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db815/db815c158195b44059eae79ce443b41a136a4657" alt="Card image cap"
President Trump issued an executive order to expand in vitro fertilization (IVF) access and lower costs, which can run up to $25,000 for a cycle. Jill Lehmann Photography/Getty Images
- President Donald Trump signed an executive order to improve access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and reduce costs, which run as much as $25,000 for a cycle.
- Trump anticipates a proposal for nationwide IVF expansion within 90 days, but it’s unclear how long it could take for changes to out-of-pocket costs to occur.
- Fertility treatments like IVF are already covered by insurance in at least 40 states, with many companies offering fertility benefits to workers.
- Infertility rates are rising in the United States, with as many as 1 in 8 females affected.
President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Tuesday to expand access to in vitro fertilization (IVF).
The self-proclaimed “father of IVF” pledged during the 2024 presidential campaign to make the procedure more affordable for the growing number of people in the United States with fertility challenges.
The president has not yet specified how the treatments would be paid for. Infertility is not covered by many insurance companies in the U.S.
While some employers provide cost-sharing fertility benefits to help reduce the financial burden of assisted reproductive technologies like IVF, many Americans pay out-of-pocket. A single IVF cycle can range from $12,000 to $17,000, and as much as $25,000 if medications are needed.
However, an IVF cycle does not guarantee a live birth and often requires multiple treatment rounds.
“Providing support, awareness, and access to affordable fertility treatments can help these families navigate their path to parenthood with hope and confidence,” the executive order states.
“Therefore, to support American families, it is the policy of my Administration to ensure reliable access to IVF treatment, including by easing unnecessary statutory or regulatory burdens to make IVF treatment drastically more affordable.”
No immediate impact on IVF costs, access
IVF access varies from state to state. Currently, 22 states and Washington, DC have infertility coverage laws that vary widely. Massachusetts and Illinois have legislation mandating insurance coverage for IVF treatment.
To meet the growing need for IVF treatments, an increasing number of employers offer fertility benefits to workers to help with cost sharing. Fertility insurance can help offset infertility testing, diagnostics, and treatment costs.
“Mandating coverage of IVF by insurance companies is certainly feasible as it is already being done on a state-by-state basis,” said Roger Shedlin, MD, CEO of WIN, a fertility and family wellness benefits provider.
“This executive order is an important acknowledgment that access to fertility care matters. We’ve already seen state-level success in expanding IVF coverage through mandated insurance benefits—now there’s an opportunity to build on that momentum at a national scale,” he told Healthline.
However, state and federal-level policy change doesn’t happen overnight.
Trump’s executive order set a 90-day deadline for the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy to submit “a list of policy recommendations on protecting IVF access and aggressively reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatment.”
This means the executive order will not immediately impact IVF costs or access. Beyond the 90-day timeline, it is unclear when changes to policies around IVF may start to shift.
“Generally, changes like this take time and are subject to the system catching up with demand,” said Christy Lane, Co-Founder of Flora Fertility, a fertility insurance provider.
“[The] ability to pay will still often prioritize who gets access. It is important for people to own their health outcomes through private coverage where possible, so they are not subject to shifting political outcomes that can impact their healthcare access,” she told Healthline.
Lane explained that proposals like Trump’s IVF plan would broaden coverage for people with health insurance to help them avoid high out-of-pocket costs. While this is undoubtedly a positive effect, she noted the increase in demand could stretch fertility clinics beyond capacity and lead to longer wait times.
“It will be imperative to utilize all the treatment options that come before IVF (such as medications and IUI), which can have successful outcomes with early intervention. These are currently not addressed in the executive order,” she said.
Trump’s IVF views clash with some conservatives
Trump’s position on improving IVF access clashes with some conservative groups and political leaders that have challenged the concept of personhood with regard to frozen embryos conceived via IVF.
In February 2024, an Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are children, and destroying them, which is common practice after a successful live birth from IVF, is considered murder under state law. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, a Republican, later signed a bill offering legal protection for medical professionals providing IVF as well as patients.
While Trump has continued to support IVF access, the executive order does not address whether frozen embryos conceived via IVF would be eligible under the proposed expansion.
The executive order does not address whether transgender couples are eligible for improved access to the procedure, which would clash with the new federal “gender ideology” policy recognizing only two sexes: male and female.
In Congress, Republicans are not yet on board with expanding IVF access. In June 2024, the party blocked a Democratic bill that would have guaranteed nationwide access to the procedure.
“Fertility treatments are medical treatments and should be covered like them,” Shedlin said.
“Simply offering limited financial assistance isn’t enough — we need structured insurance coverage that ensures people can access the right treatments at the right time.”
What to know about infertility
Infertility rates have risen in recent years, affecting around 9% of males and 11% of females in the U.S.
Rising infertility rates may be attributed to a number of factors, including:
- Delayed childbearing — egg quality and quantity and sperm quantity and motility diminish with age.
- Increased exposure to environmental toxins.
- Unhealthy lifestyle habits — smoking, alcohol use, and poor diet have been linked to infertility.
- Stress arising from fertility challenges that make it difficult to become pregnant.
Couples facing fertility challenges often turn to assisted reproductive technology (ART) to help them conceive.
Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a common intervention with varying success rates that decrease among females over 40. With IUI, the sperm is injected into the uterus through a catheter to increase the odds of fertilization during a female’s most fertile window. It requires far less medication and is more cost-effective than IVF.
With IVF, the treatment begins with self-administered injections containing estrogen-blocking medications and follicle-stimulating hormones to help the ovaries produce more eggs. When it’s time to trigger ovulation, the eggs are retrieved and fertilized in a laboratory dish (in vitro) before being transferred to a uterus or frozen.
Fertility doctors often recommend bypassing IUI and trying IVF since the success rates are higher, particularly if the couple is older or of “advanced maternal age” (over 35).
Still, IVF success rates are not high. A 2021 study shows that implantation was successful in 19% of people who underwent fresh embryo transfers. Among those who underwent frozen embryo transfers, successful implantation rates were higher at 29%. Pregnancy rates and live births were higher in the frozen embryo transfer group.
Many IVF implantations do not “stick” on the first try, leaving couples to decide whether they will try again and bear the costs and accompanying emotions of another fertility cycle.
Removing barriers to the procedure could help the millions of people facing infertility expand their families and reallocate some of those financial resources to the growing costs of raising children in the U.S.
“Access to IVF and fertility support should not be inaccessible due to finances. Governments and companies have the ability to help more people build families through well-managed care,” Shedlin said.
Takeaway
Infertility rates are rising in the U.S. To meet the growing need for fertility treatments, President Trump issued an executive order to expand in vitro fertilization (IVF) access.
It’s unclear how long it could take for changes to occur regarding out-of-pocket costs for the procedure, which can run up to $25,000 for a cycle.
Many states offer coverage for fertility treatments like IVF. Many employers offer fertility benefits to help offset costs.
“Expanded access means moving beyond one-size-fits-all policies,” Shedlin said. “It’s about ensuring comprehensive, managed coverage that provides not just a dollar amount, but the right care pathways to improve success rates and reduce costs over time.”